Gray text indicates entries with no live view count (in case you have the Live View Pack) and red text indicating entries with a lower value than a previous one. Speaking of history data, that tab was also beefed up. The trend line also indicates this: with a dashed section marking ignored history data and a dot showing the forecasting start date. And forecasting will only take into account history entries having both counters. In case you have live view counts for part of your history data – just like on the above screen shot showing my 7D Mark II – the live view count graph will only appear for the respective part. Just like the Usage Meter (and the Distribution Chart), the Graph now displays live view actuations in light blue. So now you can toggle between photo only and photo + live view display via the menu (as well as the More tab in the iOS version), by clicking/tapping the “Shutter Count” title on the Camera Summary tab and via a dedicated check box/switch on the Graph tab.
We’ve received quite a few requests to allow photo count only display even if you have the Live View Pack, and to separate these values. If yours is over 100%, an orange indicator will appear on the Usage Meter marking the 100% position. Of course these ratings are not hard limits, so your camera may go well over 100% – I’ve seen several ones with 300% or more.
SHUTTER COUNTER NIKON PLUS
The dark blue part indicates still photos, the light blue live view actuations (the latter is available when you purchased the Live View Pack). Percentage display was formerly available in the Plus Pack, but now it’s in the base app. Have you been stealing the ruby out of the navel of any fat little idols or raiding any tombs lately.? From the above litany, I can only conclude that you are cursed.Usage Meter showing still photo and live view counts
SHUTTER COUNTER NIKON SERIES
Edited July 19 by rodeo_joe|1Īnd that, ladies and gents, is why I now use a Sony A7Riv and not a Z series Nikon. No such issue with my supposedly 'plasticky' Tamron SP 24-70 that's delivered high quality images for years now.Īnd that, ladies and gents, is why I now use a Sony A7Riv and not a Z series Nikon. There was no consistency none of the samples actually felt the same, and there were numerous reports of the Zoom ring seizing up. And I rejected a number of 24-70mm f/2.8 AF-S Nikkor zooms due to a poor 'feel' - either gritty, stiff or sloppy zoom rings. The 17-55 Zoom Nikkor I bought to go with the D7200 has some obvious de-centring as well. Luckily (?) the fatal shutter fault got the camera swapped out for a new one, which has far better AF accuracy - but still not perfect. What finally put the nail in the coffin of my lengthy patronage of Nikon was my experience with the D800, that 1) immediately had to be returned from new with a severe AF error, 2) developed a sloppy 'joystick' button after a couple of years fairly light use - I was no longer working in photography at that time - and 3) now has the dreaded, and common, pushed-in 10 pin socket - that I believe Nikon still refuses to acknowledge as a manufacturing fault.Īlmost concurrently I bought a D7200 that had a failed shutter after 4 weeks use, as well as a huge AF offset that needed an 'end-stopping' AF fine tune. Resulting in the standard 'within spec' report and nothing being done. I was never happy with the metering in my D700, but decided to live with it after losing use of the camera for several weeks to Nikon UK's appalling service.
I wish but my camera needed a rather major repair ($400) in 2018 and that was 5 years old with only approx 5500 actuations.
0 kommentar(er)
